what is the advantage of running two TS9's at the same time like SRV, with each at low gain? Is it mostly for compresssion?
A tubescreamer is compressed enough as is...in fact, IMO, they are too compressed but in answer to your question, Stevie used one for grit/crunch and the other for a boost with very little gain...just a volume boost
I use to run a TS-5 with my TS-9 into my old Twin. The TS-5 was set for gain The TS-9 for boost. With both on I got a real thick tone. SRV used a TS-808 for boost only according to Warren Haynes. .
If you want compression and Tubescreamer-like grind, check out the Visual Sound Route 66. It's a pretty cool pedal for anything from blues to hard rock.
Originally Posted by kmcguitarsI use to run a TS-5 with my TS-9 into my old Twin. The TS-5 was set for gain The TS-9 for boost. With both on I got a real thick tone. SRV used a TS-808 for boost only according to Warren Haynes. .
1
Usually in that type of setup, one is use for gain, and one is used to boost the signal. The effect will end up giving you a crap load of sustain.
A tubescreamer is compressed enough as is...in fact, IMO, they are too compressed but in answer to your question, Stevie used one for grit/crunch and the other for a boost with very little gain...just a volume boost
I use to run a TS-5 with my TS-9 into my old Twin. The TS-5 was set for gain The TS-9 for boost. With both on I got a real thick tone. SRV used a TS-808 for boost only according to Warren Haynes. .
If you want compression and Tubescreamer-like grind, check out the Visual Sound Route 66. It's a pretty cool pedal for anything from blues to hard rock.
Originally Posted by kmcguitarsI use to run a TS-5 with my TS-9 into my old Twin. The TS-5 was set for gain The TS-9 for boost. With both on I got a real thick tone. SRV used a TS-808 for boost only according to Warren Haynes. .
1
Usually in that type of setup, one is use for gain, and one is used to boost the signal. The effect will end up giving you a crap load of sustain.
文章標籤
全站熱搜
