software

Can anyone elaborate on the differences between the two and if the twin measures up to the Reverb model?

To the best of my knowledge all twin's 65' and on had verb. If your talking
about a Non-verb model. I'm guessing it would be tweed era?

...which could mean the '57 twin ri that's currently out. That's a great amp, but very much different from any other twin. 40 watts, and a thicker, tweed tone.

Otherwise, yeah, all twins post-tweed have reverb.

I have a feeling he is talking about a 65 reissue and the other BF Twin that is channels switching...the quot;EVIL TWINquot;.

The Twin has reverb but also has a not so good sounding distorion channel. It still does the clean alright but I would go with the Twin Reverb and use a pedal for higher gain sounds.


Originally Posted by the guy who invented fireI have a feeling he is talking about a 65 reissue and the other BF Twin that is channels switching...the quot;EVIL TWINquot;.It's an Re-Issue model, possibly a '65 (that is if the '65 RI has reverb). It's used but taken care of real well by current owner. IT HAS REVERB, which is why I can't understand why it isn't just named quot;Twin Reverbquot; also. Damn evil twin!

So how does it stack up against the Twin Reverb?

I am assuming they are similar in sound... especially good for use with Tele's.