software

I tried to post a link yesterday to a picture of the inside of an Air Norton for clairification on that subject. For those of you that were interested here's a link to that picture.

from : localhost/i25.photobucket.com/albums/c76/wxs3/Photo003.jpg

Please note that while the quality of my camera sucks, you can still make out the 4 plastic spacers that create the quot;Air Buckerquot; on the corners of the magnet. A member here stated that as long as the pickup had quot;air gapsquot; that it was a Air Bucker and it didn't need the plastic spacers. I agree with half of the statement that you need the air gaps to create the air bucker, but you need the spacer to create the air gaps. This is in no way a slam on the other member, just clarification for myself and anyone else who may have had a question on this.
i cant see **** in that picture...
and damn. i thought you were going to slice it up =/

so that's how dmz does it. 4 spacers on the outermost slugs/polepieces to create a gap and they term it 'technology'.


Originally Posted by daniso that's how dmz does it. 4 spacers on the outermost slugs/polepieces to create a gap and they term it 'technology'.
Well the quot;wheelquot; is a form of technology as well so yeah...that kinda makes sense.


Originally Posted by daniso that's how dmz does it. 4 spacers on the outermost slugs/polepieces to create a gap and they term it 'technology'.

Yeah, that's way more misleading than selling the same pickup with different magnets/poles and calling them different things

It is a different design and they created a term to describe it differently...whats the beef?

No beef. The pickup sounds great, too.

is there a way to jerri rig similar plastic gaps on non-Dimarzio pickups


Originally Posted by GuitaristNo beef. The pickup sounds great, too.

Too bad, I like a beefy pickup!

Tux , i think any type of rubber or silicone ring would work. The beef is a reduced power of the magnet: a cheap A5 with the strength of an a3 or A2


Originally Posted by waltI tried to post a link yesterday to a picture of the inside of an Air Norton for clairification on that subject. For those of you that were interested here's a link to that picture.

from : localhost/i25.photobucket.com/albums/c76/wxs3/Photo003.jpg

Please note that while the quality of my camera sucks, you can still make out the 4 plastic spacers that create the quot;Air Buckerquot; on the corners of the magnet. A member here stated that as long as the pickup had quot;air gapsquot; that it was a Air Bucker and it didn't need the plastic spacers. I agree with half of the statement that you need the air gaps to create the air bucker, but you need the spacer to create the air gaps. This is in no way a slam on the other member, just clarification for myself and anyone else who may have had a question on this.

bro please do me a big favor and call my bud Steve blucher(chief designer at DMZ) at dimarzio
if you just remove the plastic spacers it is still a air bucker
HE TOLD ME THIS

those spacers you see at the corners are too keep the magnet centered and from toching the magnet
I have made many a duncan a air bucker


Originally Posted by daniso that's how dmz does it. 4 spacers on the outermost slugs/polepieces to create a gap and they term it 'technology'.

i think it is a great idea as simplistic as it is
yeah it is technology since NO ONE EVER DID IT BEFORE


Originally Posted by WICKED LESTERyeah it is technology since NO ONE EVER DID IT BEFORE

now that should be termed invention isn't it?


Originally Posted by daninow that should be termed invention isn't it?

innovation or whatever you call it, it is damn clever

one other note,
a air bucker is not the same thing as a quot;agedquot; magnetread,
What are Airbuckers?
Airbuckers are full-sized humbuckers that contain a gap or space between the magnet and the polepieces. The distance is quite small, and may be filled with nothing but air or by some non-magnetic material. The purpose of the gap is to lessen the magnetic field over the pickup, which in turn lets the string vibrate more freely. This results in a purer, more open sound and improved sustain.
The other purpose of the “air” design is to reliably reproduce the performance of vintage humbuckers (1950s and 60s), many of which contain magnets weakened by age and mishandling. Weakened or quot;agedquot; magnets are inherently unstable, and therefore cause unpredictable performance. Airbuckers utilize stable, full-strength magnets, yet the magnetic field is the same as produced by an quot;agedquot; magnet, thus offering the performance advantage without the unpredictability.

So are the airbucker magnets narrower than standard magnets, or are the polepieces slightly farther apart?


Originally Posted by chillSo are the airbucker magnets narrower than standard magnets, or are the polepieces slightly farther apart?
no they are the same dimension as most standard mags, but there is NO screw keeper bar for the screws and the stud poles are thinner at the bottom where the magent's side is
this creates a gap between the mag and the poles


Originally Posted by WICKED LESTERno they are the same dimension as most standard mags, but there is NO screw keeper bar for the screws and the stud poles are thinner at the bottom where the magent's side is
this creates a gap between the mag and the polesI'm not doubting you, I'm just curious, any pics??