software

Which one?...identical woods one's stained and one's not....

from : localhost/www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar...del=RGA121amp;z=y
from : localhost/www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar...21amp;z=yamp;color=1

The stained one.

I like the natural version better actually. Cool contrast with the neck and hardware.

Although, the stained version does make it look like the headstock matches a bit more.

As much as I love the natural look of the first one, I'm gonna go with the stained one because I like the look of how it matches the headstock better, and that body looks pretty dam nice.

Rock On


Originally Posted by FretFireI like the natural version better actually. Cool contrast with the neck and hardware.

I usually like contrasts, but with this one it just looks strange imo

Originally Posted by FretFireAlthough, the stained version does make it look like the headstock matches a bit more.

1

I'd say the stained one...

stained!!

-Mike

stained

Natural, although the 2-piece non figured top makes me laugh. IMO there is NO good reason against using one piece on a thin, unfigured top like that except to save costs...If it were at least bookmatched and not clearly 2 pieces on the first glance....

The stained finish does a nice job of hiding that....The things people pass off as quality these days.

stained one is more wicked.

STAIND!!!
wait...

stained

Neither!!!

I argee with theodie. But if i would have to pick i would say stained. There question 'which guitar' doesnt really suit this, cause its the same guitar, just different finish.

stained

Stained. The natural colour is very unballanced with the headstock.


Originally Posted by dd12939STAIND!!!
wait...

damn it... someone's always a step ahead

slade